Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Zhu's trocar placement in laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of complicated appendicitis / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 918-923, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-691296
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Zhu's trocar placement (ZTP) in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the treatment of complicated appendicitis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 139 complicated appendicitis patients undergoing LA at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from June 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. ZTP-LA group comprised 59 cases and its procedure was as follows 10 mm umbilical trocar was used as lens port; 12 mm trocar at crossing point of umbilical hole horizontal line and right midclavicular line was used as main operating port; 5 mm trocar at the crossing point of horizontal line 0-3 cm below umbilicus and right anterior axillary line was used as assist operating port with the drainage function for Douglas fossa and right iliac fossa; The operator and the assistant stood on the right side and the left side of the patient respectively. Traditional three-port group comprised 80 cases (8 cases converted to laparotomy, 72 cases enrolled finally) and its procedure was as follows 10 mm lens port below umbilicus; 10-12 mm main operating port at lateral border of left lower rectus abdominis; 5 mm assist operating port above pubis; The operator and the assistant stood on left side of the patient. The operative time, time to oral semi-fluid, postoperative hospital stay, cost during hospitalization, and postoperative morbidity of complication were compared between two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Baseline data such as gender, age, WBC count, percentage of leukocyte, pathological finding and type were not significantly different between two groups(all P>0.05). The conversion rate in ZTP-LA was significantly lower than that in traditional three-port group [0%(0/59) vs. 10.0%(8/80),χ²=4.552,P=0.033]. Compared with traditional three-port group, ZTP-LA group showed shorter operative time [(47.8±20.1) minutes vs. (66.0±27.3) minutes, t=4.383,P<0.001], shorter time to oral semi-fluid [(35.0±20.7) hours vs. (59.3±32.8) hours, t=5.158,P<0.001], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(4.1±1.6) days vs. (5.5±2.2) days, t=4.162, P<0.001], lower postoperative morbidity of complication [3.4% (2/59) vs. 18.1%(13/72), χ²=6.879, P=0.009], lower incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess [0%(0/59) vs. 11.1%(8/72), χ²=5.179, P=0.023], lower incidence of paralytic ileus [1.7%(1/59) vs. 12.5%(9/72), χ²=3.946, P=0.047] and less cost during hospitalization[(13 585±2909) yuan vs.(16 861±5334) yuan, t=4.463, P<0.001].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>ZTP-LA is safe, feasible and effective with advantages of faster recovery and less cost in the treatment of complicated appendicitis.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Appendectomy / Appendicitis / Postoperative Complications / General Surgery / Surgical Instruments / Retrospective Studies / Treatment Outcome / Laparoscopy / Length of Stay / Methods Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Year: 2018 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Appendectomy / Appendicitis / Postoperative Complications / General Surgery / Surgical Instruments / Retrospective Studies / Treatment Outcome / Laparoscopy / Length of Stay / Methods Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Year: 2018 Type: Article