Analysis of effi cacy of treatment in 141 patients with high-risk acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding / 中华急诊医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To retrospectively analyze the emergency treatment in 141 patients with high-risk of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding(AUGIB) in order to improve the effi cacy of treatment. In addition, to evaluate the predictive values in accuracy terms of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blachford(GBS) and Pre-Rockall scores for risk stratifi cation in AUGIB by comparison among them. Methods Data of 141 patients with AUGIB admitted from Nov.1,2013 to May 31,2017 in our emergency department(ED) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients at fi rst were treated with pharmacologic therapy in emergency room, and some of them underwent endoscopic remedy, intervention or surgery as a last resort. The scores of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blachford(GBS) and Pre-Rockall scores were calculated respectively, and the in-hospital 30-day death and re-bleeding were taken as the study endpoints. Comparison of clinical value among the three scores was carried out by plotting their ROC and calculating the AUC. Results Of them, 65.25% patients underwent endoscopy, and the leading cause of bleeding was peptic ulcer (64.12%). Endoscopic hemostatic clips were used in 8 cases, endoscopic sclerotic therapy in 4 cases, balloon tamponade in 4 cases, TEA (therapeutic embolization approach) in 9 cases, TIPS (trans-internal jugular vein for making hepatic portal vein shunt by stent) in 3 cases, and surgical intervention in 2 cases. Re-bleeding rate was 14.18%, death rate 11.35%. AIMS65 and Pre-Rockall were better than GBS in predicting in-hospital 30-day mortality. There was no difference in predicting re-bleeding among these three scores. Conclusions Medicines combined with endoscopy, various interventions and surgical operation can effectively treat high-risk patients with AUGIB. Both AIMS65 and Pre-Rockall are able to predict mortality accurately with easy practice. Both are suitable in ED to stratify the risk of AUGIB.