Risk factors of underestimating diagnosis with ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy / 复旦学报（医学版）

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the risk factors of underestimation from core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer after surgical excision.Methods One hundred and fifteen cases of CNB diagnosed DCIS treated in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Fudan University from Jan.,2010 to Dec.,2016 were analyzed retrospectively.According to postoperative pathological conditions,the cases were divided into underestimation group and non underestimation group.The clinicopathological characteristics of two groups were compared,including age,palpability,tumor diameter,microcalcification,BI-RADS classification and CNB method.Results The overall underestimating rate was 27.0％ (31/115).Univariate analysis found correlation between a palpable lesion,diameter of tumor ＞20 mm,microcalcification,a high BI-RADS classification,use of the 14/16-gauge needle method and underestimation from CNB diagnosed DCIS.Multivariate analysis by Logistic regression showed that diameter of tumor ＞20 mm (OR =0.186,95％CI0.043-0.810,P =0.025),microcalcification (OR=0.229,95％CI0.070-0.749,P =0.015),use of the 14/16 gauge needle method (OR =0.171,95 ％ CI0.043-0.679,P =0.012) were independent risk factors of underestimation from CNB diagnosed DCIS.Conclusions Size of lesion ＞20 mm,microcalcification,use of the 14/16-gauge needle method were independent risk factors of underestimation from CNB diagnosed DCIS.