Wiltse approach versus conventional posterior midline approach for single thoracolumbar fracture:A Me-ta-analysis / 实用医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Wiltse approach and conven-tional posterior midline approach for single thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Databases including Embase, PubMed,cnki,WanFang Data were searched to collect the related literatures for single thoracolumbar fracture treated with surgery of Wiltse approach and conventional posterior midline approach. The data were collected and evaluated by different reviewers independently and the Meta analysis was conducted by using the RevMan 5.3. Results A total of 6 literatures involving 351 patients were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in surgical duration,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative discharge volume, and visual analog score(VAS)(P < 0.000 01). There was no significant difference between the Cobb angle(P =0.69)and the fanterior edge convex height(P=0.46).Conclusions Wiltse approach is superior to conventional posterior midline approach for single thoracolumbar fracture with shorter surgical duration,less intraoperative blood loss,less postoperative discharge and lower incidence of postoperative backache. It reduces spine malformation, maintains height of the fanterior edge convex.Wiltse approach is a safe and feasible surgical technique for treating single thoracolumbar fracture.