Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the effect between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus / 新乡医学院学报
Journal of Xinxiang Medical College ; (12): 133-135,139, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-699486
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect between percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP) in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus,so as to provide evidence for the treatment of renal pelvis calculus.Methods A total of 108 patients with renal pelvis calculus were selected from January 2012 to December 2016 in Zhumadian Central Hospital.The patients were divided into PCNL group (n =59) and RLP group (n =49) according to the therapeutic method.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative blood transfusion rate,operative success rate,stone clearance rate,postoperative hemoglobin reduction,postoperative analgesia time,postoperative hospitalization time and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The success rate of operation in PC-NL group and RLP group was 94.9% (56/59) and 100.0% (49/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the success rate of operation between the two groups (x2 =1.026,P > 0.05).The stone clearance rate in PCNL group and RLP group was 94.9% (56/59) and 98.0% (48/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (x2 =0.140,P > 0.05).The intraoperative blood transfusion rate in PCNL group and RLP group was 5.1% (3/59) and 2.0% (1/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood transfusion rate between the two groups (x2 =0.105,P > 0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative analgesia time between the two groups (P > 0.05).Compared with the PCNL group,the blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin reduction were less,and the postoperative hospitalization time was shorter in the RLP group (P < 0.05).The incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage in PCNL group was 3.4% (2/59),8.5% (5/59)and 6.8% (4/59) respectively;the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage in RLP group was 8.2% (4/49),4.1% (2/49) and 4.1% (2/49) respectively;there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage between the two groups (x2 =2.975,1.064,1.811;P > 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of PCNL and RLP in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus is fairly,and their safety is high.However,RLP has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding,quick postoperative recovery and short hospitalization time.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Xinxiang Medical College Year: 2018 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Xinxiang Medical College Year: 2018 Type: Article