Comparison of the effect between minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of recurrent lubar intervertebral disc pro-trusion / 新乡医学院学报

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sion(MIS-TLIF)and posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)in the treatment of recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc hernia-tion(LIDH). Methods Twenty-nine patients with recurrent LIDP were selected from May 2014 to May 2016 in Weifang Peo-ple's Hospital and the clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Thirteen patients were given MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF group) and sixteen patients were given PLIF(PLIF)group. The operative incision length,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative drainage volume,hospitalization time and complications were compared between the two groups. The lumbar function was evalu-ated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score standard,and the clinical effect was compared between the two groups according to the modified Macnab standard one year after treatment. Results The operativeincision length,intraopera-tive bleeding volume,postoperative drainage volumeand hospitalization time in MIS-TLIF group were significantly less than tho-sein PLIF group (P < 0. 05). The preoperative JOA score of lumbar function in PLIF group and MIS-TLIF group was 7. 9 ± 1. 9 and 8. 0 ± 1. 6 respectively,it was 24. 0 ± 2. 7 and 24. 2 ± 2. 5 respectively at one year after treatment,there was no significant-difference in the JOA score between the two groups before and one year after operation (P > 0. 05). The JOA score atone year after operation was significantly higher than that before operation in the two groups (P < 0. 05). According to the modified Macnab standard one year after treatment,the fineness rate of the patients in PLIF group was 87. 50％(14 / 16),the fineness rate of the patients in the MIS-TLIF group was 84. 62％(11 / 13). There was no significant difference in the fineness rate be-tweenthe two groups (χ2 = 1. 380,P > 0. 05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the MIS-TLIF group and PLIF group was 7. 7％(1/ 13)and 6. 3％ (1/ 16)respectively,there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (χ2 = 0. 020,P > 0. 05). There were 8 cases (61. 5％)with gradeⅠfusion and 5 cases (38. 5％)with gradeⅡfusion in MIS-TLIF group,there were 9(56. 3％)with gradeⅠfusion and 7(43. 8％)with gradeⅡfu-sion,there was no significant difference in the constituent ratio with gradeⅠandⅡfusion between the two groups (χ2 = 0. 080, P >0. 05). Conclusion MIS-TLIF in treatment of recurrent LIDH has the advantages of less incision,less intraoperative bleed-ing,less postoperative drainage and shorter hospitalization time;and the clinical effect of MIS-TLIF is similar to that of PLIF.