Comparison of over-the-scope clip and traditional through-the-scope clip in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding / 中国内镜杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective?To compare the difference between endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip and conventional endoscopic hemostasis with through-the-scope clip for treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.?Methods?Using the method of retrospective study, 22 cases of peptic ulcer bleeding patients treated by endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip and 24 cases recently completed by endoscopic hemostasis with through-the-scope clip before the application of endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip as the research object, then evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip by comparing immediate hemostasis success (rate), the total number of clips used for operation, first successful hemostasis (rate), postoperative recurrence (rate), hemostasis success (rate), rebleeding (rate), two endoscopic treatment (rate), permanent hemostasis (rate), complication (rate), postoperative hospital stay (d), mortality (rate).?Results?Immediate hemostasis success (rate) of peptic ulcer bleeding patients treated by endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip was 20/22 (90.9%) and the total number of clips used for operation was 22, the first successful hemostasis (rate) was 20/22 (90.9%), postoperative recurrence (rate) was 1/20 (5.0%), successful hemostasis (rate) was19/22 (86.4%), rebleeding (rate) was 1/20 (5.0%), two endoscopic treatment (rate) was 3/22 (13.6%), permanent hemostasis (rate) was 18/22 (81.8%), complications (rate) was 0/22 (0.0%), postoperative hospital stay time (d) was (8.95 ± 0.96) d, death (rate) was 0/22 (0.0%). Immediate hemostasis success (rate) of peptic ulcer bleeding patients treated by hemostasis therapy with through-the-scope clip was 13/24 (54.2%) and the total number of clips used for operation was 56, the first successful hemostasis (rate) was 13/24 (54.2%), postoperative recurrence (rate) was 0/13 (0.0%), successful hemostasis (rate) was 13/24 (54.2%), rebleeding (rate) was 0/13 (0.0%), two endoscopic treatment (rate) was 11/24 (45.8%), permanent hemostasis (rate) was 13/24 (54.2%), complications (rate) was 0/24 (0.0%), hospitalization time after operation (d) was (8.54 ± 0.53) d, death (rate) was 1/24 (4.2%). Immediate hemostasis success (rate), first successful hemostasis (rate), hemostasis success (rate), and permanent hemostasis (rate) were higher in the OTSC group than in the TTSC group. However, two endoscopic treatment (rate) was lower in the OTSC group than in the TTSC group (P < 0.05).?Conclusion?Endoscopic hemostasis with over-the-scope clip is safe and effective on the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding,it can be used as the first choice for the treatment of complicated and refractory peptic ulcer bleeding due to rupture of blood vessel with the larger diameter or other causes.