Prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in septic shock patients / 中华急诊医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in septic shock patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A single-center, prospective tudy was conducted. The relevant information of septic shock patients who underwent an echocardiographic assessment during the initial management were analyzed in ICU of Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University from June 2016 to October 2017. Hemodynamics were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography within the first 24 h of shock, and LV diastolic dysfunction is present if the available parameters meet the cutoff values. Patients' characteristics, arterial blood gas analysis, and blood biochemical indexes were recorded in the first 24h at ICU admission. Additionally, the following information were retrieved during ICU stay site of infection, frequency of adrenaline and dobutamine, maximal dose of norepinephrine, use of hydrocortisone, invasive mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors associated with septic shock mortality, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of all risk factors on the outcome of patients. Results Among the 138 patients with septic shock hospitalized in the ICU during the study period, 102 patients were enrolled [76 men (75％); aged 64 ± 12 years] and 92 of them (90％) were mechanically ventilated. Thirty patients died in ICU with a mortality rate of 29％. LV diastolic dysfunction was observed in 32 patients (31％). No significant inter-group difference in infection characteristics was found. The death group had significantly higher APACHE Ⅱ score, SOFA score, lactate and creatinine levels than the survival group. Similarly, the death group received a greater dose of vasopressors and required more frequent administration of epinephrine than the survivors. While the dead group exhibited slightly yet significantly larger RV cavity, which was reflected by a significant greater RVEDA/LVEDA ratio (0.77 ± 0.43 vs 0.59 ± 0.17) with no association with paradoxical septal motion. Mean value of lateral e′ maximal velocity was significantly lower in the death group compared with the survival group(10.50 ± 3.80)cm/s vs (12.9 ± 4.6)cm/s. The proportion of LV diastolic dysfunction tended to be higher in the death group than in the survival group (14/30 vs 18/72). In the multivariate analysis, the maximal dose of norepinephrine (OR=1.69, 95％CI1.05-2.79), the SOFA score(OR=2. 24,95％CI1.32-3.35) ,e′ lateral maximal velocity (OR=2.23, 95 ％ CI1.01-5.57), lactate(OR=2.36, 95％CI1.25-5.43) and LV diastolic dysfunction(OR=1.32,95％CI1.11-3.15) were significantly associated with septic shock mortality. The area under ROC curve of lateral e′ maximal velocity for predicting death of septic shock patients was 0.63 (95％CI 0.54-0.78) and the cut-off value was 8.9 cm/s, with a sensitivity and specificity of 76％ and 54％, respectively. Conclusions The present study suggests that LV diastolic function might be associated with ICU mortality in patients with septic shock. A multicenter prospective study assessing a large cohort of patients using serial echocardiographic examinations remains to confirm the prognostic value of LV diastolic dysfunction in septic shock patients.