Clinical study on 48 children with head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma treated by multi-disciplinary therapy / 中华实用儿科临床杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the short-term efficacy in children with head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HN-RMS) treated by multidisciplinary therapy,and to analyze the prognostic factors,so as to guide the diagnosis and treatment.Methods Patients with HN-RMS admitted at Hematology Oncology Center of Beijing Children's Hospital (BCH),Capital Medical University between December 2012 and May 2017,were included in this case-observation study.The clinical characteristics were analyzed and the treatment effect and prognostic factors were summarized.Results A total of 48 cases were collected,including 36 boys and 12 girls,with a median age of 4.6 years.Primarysite parameningeal RMS(PM-RMS) (34 cases,70.8％),orbital (2 cases,4.2％) and non-orbital,non-parameningeal region(12 cases,25.0％) were found.Twenty cases belonged to alveolar type(41.7％),and 28 cases were of embryonaltype(58.3％).The diameter of the tumor was ＞5 cm(n =25,52.1％),and ≤5 cm(n =23,47.9％).IRS stagingthere were 29 cases(60.4％) of stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ,19 cases (39.6％) of stage Ⅳ;29 cases (60.4％) of low-medium risk,and 19 cases (39.6％) of high risk.Twenty-three patients (47.9％) received surgery,and 25 cases (52.1％) received biopsy only.All patients (48 cases) received systemic chemotherapy.Twenty patients (41.6％) received external radiation,15 cases (31.3％) received 125I particle implantation,6 cases (12.5％) received proton therapy,but 3 cases (6.2％)did not receive radiation.The follow-up time lasted 13-57 months[(24.1 ± 12.3) months].The 2-year overall survival(OS) rate was (66.4 ± 7.2)％,and 2-year event free survival (EFS) rate was (59.9 ± 7.5) ％.Patients with tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm had higher OS and EFS than patients with tumor diameter ＞5 cm [2-year OS (87.4±6.8)％ vs.(42.9 ±6.8)％,2-year EFS (78.8 ±8.6％) vs.(38.5 ±10.8)％],and the differences were statistically significant (all P =0.006).Patients with orbital and non-orbital,non-parameningeal RMS had higher OS and EFS than PM-RMS [2-year OS 100％ vs.(87.5％ ± 11.7) ％ vs.(57.0 ± 8.8) ％;2-year EFS 100％ vs.(88.9 ± 10.5)％ vs.(51.1 ± 8.9)％],and the differences were statistically significant (P =0.008,P =0.030).Patients who received surgery had higher OS and EFS than those who did not received surgery [2-year OS (80.7±8.8)％ vs.(53.3 ± 10.4)％;2-year EFS (71.1 ±10.1)％ vs.(49.5±10.4)％],and the differences were statistically significant (P =0.008,P =0.026).COX regression analysis showed tumor diameter ＞ 5 cm was an adverse prognostic factor (OR =4.124,95％ CI1.213-14.025,P =0.023).Conclusions PM-RMS accounted for a high proportion in RMS patients.The primary site and the size of the tumor are the main prognostic factors.Intensive therapy is expected to improve the prognosis of HN-RMS with meningeal invasion.