Clinical significance of oral motor intervention on the prognosis of early premature infant / 中华危重病急救医学

ABSTRACT

Objective? To? explore? the? clinical? significance? of? early? oral? intervention? measures? in? the?prognosis?of?premature?infants.? Methods? 151?preterm?infants?admitted?to?neonatal?intensive?care?unit?(NICU)?of?Liaocheng?People's?Hospital?from?January?2015?to?January?2017?were?enrolled.?Premature?infants?were?divided?into?intervention?group?and?control?group?according?to?random?number?table?method?and?with?the?consent?of?legal?guardian.?Both?groups?received?routine?treatment?of?preterm?infants?after?stable?vital?signs.?The?intervention?group?received?the?oral?massage?method?adopted?by?none-nutritive?sucking,?stimulating?swallowing?function?and?SandraFucile?on?the?basis?of?routine?treatment,?once?a?day?for?14?consecutive?days.?Both?groups?were?followed?up?for?6?months.?The?oral?feeding?ability?of?premature?infants?was?evaluated?by?the?proficiency?(PRO),?rate?of?transfer?(RT),?feeding?process?and??non-nutritive?suction?(NNS).?At?40?weeks?of?postmenstrual?age?(PMA),?neonatal?behavioral?neurological?(NBNA)?was?used?to?assess?neonatal?brain?development;?Infanib?was?used?for?early?motor?development?evaluation?at?3?months?and??6?months?after?birth.? Results? Finally,?151?premature?infants?were?enrolled,?including?78?in?the?intervention?group?and?73?in?the?control?group.?The?time?to?complete?oral?feeding?of?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?shorter?than?that?of?the?control?group?(days?18.1±3.7?vs.?23.4±5.8,?P?<?0.05).?Compared?with?the?control?group,?at?the?time?of?complete?oral?feeding,?the?PMA?of?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?decreased?(weeks?33.4±0.9?vs.?35.9±1.9,?P <?0.05),?the?feeding?efficiency?was?significantly?increased?(mL/min?10.6±5.1?vs.?8.1±4.7,?P?<?0.05),?and?PRO?was?significantly?increased?[(95±8)%?vs.?(72±28)%,?P <?0.05],?and?the?body?weight?was?significantly?decreased?(g?1?836.0±193.0?vs.?2?000.8±204.5,?P?<?0.05).?The?NNS?scores?of?the?intervention?group?and?the?control?group?were?increased?gradually?with?time?(F?values?were?86.21?and?75.23,?respectively,?both?P?<?0.01),?and?the?NNS?scores?of?the?intervention?group?at??10?days?and?14?days?were?significantly?higher?than?those?of?the?control?group?(52.89±6.26?vs.?46.74±6.24,?73.90±7.01? vs.?63.53±6.80,?both?P?<?0.01).?The?NBNA?scores?of?the?two?groups?were?lower,?but?there?was?no?significant?difference?between?the?intervention?group?and?the?control?group?(32.7±3.6?vs.?32.0±4.1,?P?>?0.05).?Infanib?evaluation?at?3?months?of?age?showed?that?the?proportion?of?normal?children?in?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?higher?than?that?in?the?control?group?[67.95%?(53/78)?vs.?49.31%?(36/73),?P?<?0.05],?and?at?6?months?of?age,?the?proportion?of?normal?children?in?the?intervention?group?was?significantly?higher?than?that?in?the?control?group?[84.62%?(66/78)?vs.?58.90%?(43/73),??P <?0.01].? Conclusion? Early?oral?exercise?intervention?can?shorten?the?transition?time?from?tube?feeding?to?full?oral?feeding?in?NICU?premature?infants?and?improve?the?performance?of?infants?during?feeding.