Efficacy and safety of high-dose versus conventional-dose conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy for stage T1b-4N0-1M0 prostate cancer: a meta-analysis / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety between high-dose (74 to 80 Gy) and conventional-dose (64.0 to 70.2 Gy) conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy for stage T1b-4No-1M0 prostate cancer in this meta-analysis.Methods A literature search was performed in PubMea,ambasa,aochrane Librara,aeb of Scienca,aBa,aanfang Data,aNKI and Chongqing VIP to collect clinical trials on high-dose versus conventional-dose conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer from the inception to July 1,2018.The included literatures were evaluated by Cochrane quality evaluation criteria and subject to meta-analysis by using Review Manager 5.3 statistical software.Results A total of 7 randomized controlled clinical trials involving 4 132 patients were included in the meta-analysis.The meta-analysis showed that the high-dose and conventional-dose groups yielded similar 10-year overall survival (RR=1.01,95％CI0.96 to 1.07,P=0.64) and 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival (RR=1.01,95％CI0.98 to 1.03,P=0.47).The biochemical failure rate in the high-dose group was significantly lower than that in the conventional-dose group (RR =0.78,95％CI0.70 to 0.86,P＜0.01).Compared with the conventional-dose groua,ahe incidence of late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse reactions (RR=1.48,95％CI1.31 to 1.67,P＜0.01;RR=1.35,95％CI1.06 to 1.73,P=0.02) was significantly higher in the high-dose group.Conclusion High-dose conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy has advantages in reducing the biochemical failure rate of patients with stage T1b-4N0-1M0 prostate cancer.Nevertheless,whether it can improve overall survival and prostate cancer-specific survival remains to be validated.High-dose radiotherapy also induce a higher incidence rate of late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse reactions compared with conventional-dose radiotherapy.