Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil and propofol for an-esthesia in burn patients with non-intubation / 中华麻醉学杂志
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 459-461, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-755581
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with remifen-tanil and propofol for anesthesia in the burn patients with non-intubation. Methods Sixty burn patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 19-24 kg∕m2 , of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠorⅡ, scheduled for elective skin grafting with burn covering less than 10% of the total body surface, tangential excision, or dressing change with burn covering 10%-50% of the total body surface, were selected and divided into A, B and C groups using a random number table method, with 20 patients in each group. In A, B and C groups, dexmedetomidine 1. 0 μg∕kg was intravenously infused for 10 min at a constant rate, followed by an infusion of 0. 6, 0. 8 and 1. 0 μg·kg-1 ·h-1 , respectively, until 10 min be-fore the end of surgery. Remifentanil and propofol were given by target-controlled infusion via the dual chan-nel, the target plasma concentration of propofol was adjusted to maintain the index of consciousness at 40-60, and administration was stopped at the end of surgery in three groups. The development of respiratory depres-sion, body movement and hypotension was observed during operation. The consumption of remifentanil and propofol, emergence time and Ramsay sedation score at 1 h after operation were recorded. Results Com-pared with group A, the incidence of respiratory depression and consumption of propofol were significantly de-creased, and the rate of satisfaction with sedation was increased in B and C groups (P<0. 05), and the inci-dence of hypotension was significantly increased in group C ( P<0. 05) . The incidence of hypotension was sig-nificantly higher in group C than in group B ( P<0. 05) . There were no significant differences in the consump-tion of remifentanil or emergence time among three groups ( P>0. 05) , and no body movement was found in three groups. Conclusion Intravenously infused dexmedetomidine 0. 8 μg·kg-1 ·h-1 combined with remifentanil and propofol provides better efficacy when used for the burn patients with non-intubation.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2019 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2019 Type: Article