Efficacy comparison between robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer / 肿瘤研究与临床

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer, and to explore the feasibility of RDP. Methods The clinical data of 11 patients who received RDP and 26 patients who received LDP from January 2014 to May 2018 in the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The operation indexes and the hospitalized cost of both groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in spleen-preserving rate, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative bleeding and pancreatic fistula between the two groups (all P>0.05), but the amount of intraoperative bleeding in RDP group was less than that in LDP group, and the difference was statistically significant [(144±51) vs. (199±65) ml, t= -2.530, P= 0.016]. Compared with LDP group, the total hospitalization cost and operation cost of RDP group was increased [ (75000±14000) yuan vs. (107000±12000) yuan;(21000±9000) yuan vs. (39000±16000) yuan;both P<0.01]. Conclusion Both RDP and LDP are safe and feasible. LDP has the advantages of relative low cost and wide range of operations. RDP has obvious advantages in controlling intraoperative bleeding, but the high cost limits its further clinical promotion.