Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Lobectomy versus Segmentectomy in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer / 대한흉부외과학회지
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; : 195-204, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-761867
ABSTRACT
Lobectomy is considered the standard strategy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, sublobar resection for NSCLC has recently received increased attention. The objective of this study was to compare 5-year survival, recurrence-free survival, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidities in patients who received segmentectomy versus those who received lobectomy through a meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were included and the combined hazard ratios or odds ratios were calculated. The results revealed that the 5-year survival rate after segmentectomy was comparable to that of lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC. However, segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC had lower rates of postoperative mortality and morbidities than lobectomy.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Mastectomy, Segmental / Odds Ratio / Survival Rate / Mortality / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Type of study: Etiology study / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2019 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Mastectomy, Segmental / Odds Ratio / Survival Rate / Mortality / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Type of study: Etiology study / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2019 Type: Article