A Meta-Analysis Comparing Lobectomy versus Segmentectomy in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer / 대한흉부외과학회지
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
;
: 195-204, 2019.
Article
in English
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-761867
ABSTRACT
Lobectomy is considered the standard strategy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, sublobar resection for NSCLC has recently received increased attention. The objective of this study was to compare 5-year survival, recurrence-free survival, postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidities in patients who received segmentectomy versus those who received lobectomy through a meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were included and the combined hazard ratios or odds ratios were calculated. The results revealed that the 5-year survival rate after segmentectomy was comparable to that of lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC. However, segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC had lower rates of postoperative mortality and morbidities than lobectomy.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Mastectomy, Segmental
/
Odds Ratio
/
Survival Rate
/
Mortality
/
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Type of study:
Etiology study
/
Prognostic study
/
Systematic reviews
Limits:
Humans
Language:
English
Journal:
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Year:
2019
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS