Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research for Recognition of Pharmaceutical Companies toward the Effective Use of “Drug Guide for Patients” as Package Inserts for Patients / 医薬品情報学
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics ; : 116-125, 2019.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-781886
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Drug Guide for Patients” (DGP) is a drug information tool designated as one of the routine risk minimization activities in risk management plan (RMP) developed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. However, patients and their families hardly recognize DGP. Therefore, we administered a questionnaire on drug consultation service of pharmaceutical companies that provide DGP with an aim to collect their views, elucidate problems when they prepare DGPs and examine effective utilization of DGP in the future.

Methods:

We sent a questionnaire by letter for 127 drug consultation service of pharmaceutical companies, and received questionnaire results using “Questant” that is web questionnaire making software. The results were examined using Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-squared test.

Results:

We obtained responses from 84 (66.1%) companies out of 127. As for the question of the published situation of DGP on their website, the most companies responded “Not published” with 47.6% and subsequently 41.7% for “Published for healthcare professionals”. The combined rate of “Published for Patients (3.6%)” and “Published for both healthcare professionals and patients (7.1%)” was only 10.7%. On the other hand, regarding the burden of companies making DGP, we found that more than 60% of pharmaceutical companies (63.5%) felt burdensome, whereas only 36.5% responded “Not burdensome.” Regarding the question on the role of DGP in RMP, pharmaceutical companies answered that the role is “sufficient” 3.6%, 29.8% “not sufficient”, and 66.6% “unknown”.

Conclusion:

Our results suggested that it is difficult for patients to get DGP from website of pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical companies felt burdensome in making DGP, and they recognized that DGP was not very much utilized by patients. Therefore, it would be necessary to improve the creation criteria of DGP. Furthermore, we felt it necessary to have the DGP known and utilized widely by (consumers and) patients.

Search on Google
Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Qualitative research Language: Japanese Journal: Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics Year: 2019 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Qualitative research Language: Japanese Journal: Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics Year: 2019 Type: Article