Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A clinical study about comparison of inhalation anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia with oral and maxillofacial patients
Journal of the Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons ; : 291-295, 1998.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-784157
ABSTRACT
Intravenous anesthesia was compared with inhalation anesthesia in 20 patients of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to study in two treatment groups. 20 patients were injected ketamine and propofol. 20 patients were administered Enflurane. The respond of patients consciousness and general recovery condition of the two groups were compared. Intravenous anesthesia group were awake significantly faster without complications such as nause, vomiting, and agitation after operation than inhalation anesthesia group. Full recovery time of intravenous anesthesia group was significantly 3 times less than inhalation anesthesia group. The authors conclude that intravenous anesthesia is a practical technique for oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing and may be preferable to intravenous anesthesia because of the significantly short of recovery time without complications.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Surgery, Oral / Vomiting / Propofol / Inhalation / Consciousness / Dihydroergotamine / Enflurane / Anesthesia, Inhalation / Ketamine / Anesthesia, Intravenous Limits: Humans Language: Korean Journal: Journal of the Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Year: 1998 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Surgery, Oral / Vomiting / Propofol / Inhalation / Consciousness / Dihydroergotamine / Enflurane / Anesthesia, Inhalation / Ketamine / Anesthesia, Intravenous Limits: Humans Language: Korean Journal: Journal of the Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Year: 1998 Type: Article