Comparison of Experiences of Ethical Dilemma between Intensive Care Unit and General Unit Nurses regarding Treatment Decisions and Confidentiality / 중환자간호학회지
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing
;
(3): 1-11, 2018.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-788157
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study compares experiences of ethical dilemma between nurses working in intensive care units and those in general units under specific situations of treatment decisions and confidentiality.METHOD:
This cross-sectional descriptive study utilizes the self-report survey method. The survey questionnaires were completed by 50 and 52 nurses working in intensive care units and general units, respectively. The instrument, which consisted of 16 items of ethical dilemma situations about treatment decision and confidentiality, was used. The mean scores for each item were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:
The study found no differences in terms of age, gender, education level, clinical experience in years, and being educated on healthcare ethics. For 9 out of 16 items, the mean scores of nurses in intensive care units were significantly higher than those of nurses in general units.CONCLUSION:
Nurses in intensive care units experienced ethical dilemmas regarding treatment decisions and confidentiality more often than those in general units. This study emphasizes the need to establish strategies for improving the ethical competence of critical care nurses.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Mental Competency
/
Confidentiality
/
Critical Care
/
Delivery of Health Care
/
Education
/
Ethics
/
Intensive Care Units
/
Methods
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing
Year:
2018
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS