Analysis of the concealed evaluation results of academic dissertations in a medical university / 中华医学教育探索杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the quality of dissertations by analyzing the concealed evaluation results of postgraduate dissertations, and to provide a reference for improving the quality of dissertations.@*Methods@#A total of 366 postgraduate dissertations and 1 051 concealed evaluation comments were collected from a medical university, and according to the evaluation index system of postgraduate dissertations, a horizontal comparison was made based on the overall quality and discipline. Excel and SPSS 19.0 were used for statistical analysis.@*Results@#Eighty percent of the dissertations in unqualified category had poor topic selection, and the excellent and good rate was only 21% in "Standardability". In discipline-based evaluations, the basic medicine group had a poor rate of 3.8% in "Topic Selection" and 2.5% in "Mastery of Basic Knowledge and Scientific Research Ability", while the military management group had a poor rate of 5.6% in "Innovation and Value" and 1.9% in "Standardability".@*Conclusion@#Topic selection is the key to the quality of dissertations, and the groups of basic medicine and military management should improve the scientificity of topic selection and the standardability of dissertations.