Diagnostic value of combined detection of carbohydrate antigen 125 and human epididymis protein 4 for epithelial ovarian cancer / 肿瘤研究与临床

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the diagnostic value of combined detection of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) for ovarian epithelial cancer.@*Methods@#Patients who underwent surgery for the adnexal tumor at Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017 were enrolled. According to the postoperative pathological results, these patients were divided into the ovarian epithelial cancer group (494 cases) and benign ovarian disease group (462 cases). The serum expressions of HE4 and CA125 in the two groups were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay. The diagnostic value of detection of HE4 and CA125 alone or in combination for ovarian epithelial cancer was analyzed.@*Results@#The median levels (P 25 - P 75) of serum CA125 and HE4 in ovarian epithelial cancer group were 273.34 U/ml (39.34 U/ml, 709.74 U/ml) and 199.08 pmol/L (75.81 pmol/L, 449.20 pmol/L), which were higher than those in ovarian benign disease group [16.30 U/ml (6.30 U/ml, 53.60 U/ml) and 39.54 pmol/L (29.57 pmol/L, 53.80 pmol/L)] (both P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between serum CA125 and HE4 levels in ovarian epithelial cancer group (r = 0.481, P < 0.01). Serum CA125 and HE4 levels in patients with stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ were higher than those in patients with stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ (both P < 0.05), and serum CA125 and HE4 levels in patients with poor differentiation were higher than those in patients with moderate differentiation (P < 0.05). Compared with CA125, the specificity and positive predictive value of serum HE4 for the diagnosis of ovarian epithelial cancer were higher (both P < 0.01). Compared with HE4 alone, the sensitivity of CA125 combined with HE4 increased (P = 0.004) and the specificity decreased (P = 0.044). When both CA125 and HE4 were positive for positive results, compared with HE4 alone, the specificity and positive predictive value increased (both P < 0.01), but the sensitivity decreased (both P < 0.01). In patients with CA125+ HE4-, the sensitivity and specificity decreased, while in CA125- HE4+ patients, the specificity was elevated, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.892). When one of CA125 and HE4 was positive for positive results, the sensitivity and negative predictive value increased (both P < 0.01), but the specificity and positive predictive value decreased (both P < 0.01). The area under the curve of serum CA125 and HE4 combined detection was 0.911, indicating its clinical diagnostic value was better than that of the two alone.@*Conclusions@#In the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, the specificity of serum HE4 is higher than that of CA125, but the sensitivity is lower than that of CA125. The combined detection of HE4 and CA125 is more conducive to improve the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian epithelial cancer.