Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative study of pneumatic lithotripsy and holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones / 中南大学学报(医学版)
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) ; (12): 601-603, 2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-813495
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy (LL) and endoscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) for ureteral stones.@*METHODS@#We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 415 patients with ureteral calculi treated with endoscopic laser lithotripsy (n = 214 ) and pnumatic lithotripsy (n = 201 ).@*RESULTS@#The overall successful fragmentation rate of all ureteral stones in a single session of the LL group was higher than that of the PL group (95% vs. 69%, P < 0.01). The average stonefree time of the LL group was shorter than that of the PL group (18 days vs. 31 days, P < 0.01). No complications such as perforation during the operation were observed in the LL group whereas 3 perforations occurred in the PL group.@*CONCLUSION@#LL has its advantage over PL in its better clinical effect for the stone fragmentation and low complication rate and is an effective and safe treatment for ureteral stones.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutics / Ureteral Calculi / Retrospective Studies / Lithotripsy, Laser / Ureteroscopy / Holmium / Methods Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) Year: 2005 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Therapeutics / Ureteral Calculi / Retrospective Studies / Lithotripsy, Laser / Ureteroscopy / Holmium / Methods Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) Year: 2005 Type: Article