Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical effect and prognosis of glucocorticoid combined with surgical method for TAO-related upper eyelid retraction / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)
International Eye Science ; (12): 718-721, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-815766
ABSTRACT
@#

AIM:

To explore the clinical efficacy and prognosis of glucocorticoid combined with surgical method for TAO-related upper eyelid retraction. <p>

METHODS:

A total of 96 patients(146 eyes)with upper eyelid retraction who were admitted to the plastic surgery clinic and ward of our hospital from February 2014 to July 2018 were selected. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into GI group 72 patients with TAO-related upper eyelid retraction treated with glucocorticoids; 72 patients with GS group 48 patients with TAO-related upper eyelid retraction treated with glucocorticoid combined with conjunctival approach. After treatment, the upper eyelid muscle strength, the treatment effect, the height of the eyelid fissure, and the actual double eyelid width were compared between the two groups of patients.<p>

RESULTS:

After treatment, the patients in GI group had significant treatment effects in 32 people and 47 eyes, and the patients in the GS group had significant treatment effects in 16 and 25 eyes. The patients in the GS group had significant treatment effects in 46 cases and 71 eyes, and there were no significant treatment effects in 2 people and 3 eyes. Compared with the GS group, the treatment effect of the GS group was significantly higher than that of the GI group(<i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference between GS group and GI group(<i>P</i>>0.05). According to the table, before treatment, the height of the eyelid fissures in the GI group and the GS group were 11.25±1.85 and 11.31±1.46mm, and the data in the two groups were similar(<i>P</i>>0.05). The height of the eyelid fissures was 10.14±1.23mm, 3mo after treatment was 8.52±1.01mm. Compared with the GI group, the recovery of blepharoplasty was better in the GS group than in the GI group(<i>P</i><0.05). According to the table, before treatment, the upper eyelid muscle strength of the patients in the GI group and the GS group were 15.34±2.13 and 15.26±1.78mm, the data in the two groups were similar(<i>P</i>>0.05). Three months after treatment, the upper eyelid muscle strength was 15.64±1.34, 14.36±1.56mm. There was no significant difference in upper eyelid muscle between the GI group and the GS group(<i>P</i>>0.05). The results showed that before treatment, the patients with GI group and GS group actually had a double eyelid width of 5.12±1.64 and 5.16±1.48mm. The data in the two groups were similar(<i>P</i>>0.05). Three months after treatment, the double eyelid was actually The widths were 7.67±2.95 and 8.49±2.39mm, respectively. Compared with the GI group, the GI group had a better change in the double eyelid width than the GI group(<i>P</i><0.05). <p>

CONCLUSION:

Glucocorticoid combined with conjunctival approach Müller myectomy is better for patients with upper eyelid retraction, which can significantly improve the height of the eyelid fissure and the width of the double eyelid.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: International Eye Science Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: International Eye Science Year: 2020 Type: Article