Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative cross-sectional study of Chinese and American lung caner drug trial in 2019 / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 327-331, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-819163
ABSTRACT
@#Objective    To compare the current status of clinical studies regarding lung cancer between China and the United States in 2019, and to indicate the weakness, trend and future development direction of clinical studies drug treatment in China. Methods    The data of lung cancer clinical studies from January 1st to November 30th, 2019 in China and the United States were retrieved and analyzed through Informa pharmaprojects database. Results    The United States was superior on the number of projects (128 vs. 156) and research institutions (743 vs. 2 250). Compared with the United State, there were more phase Ⅲ confirmatory researches (19.5% vs. 10.3%), bioequivalent drug researches (3.1% vs. 0%), and researches initiated by academic institutions (39.8% vs. 28.1%) in China. The United States exhibited advantages in phaseⅠ andⅠ/Ⅱstudies (25.8% vs. 60.3%), immunodrugs (49.2% vs. 60.3%), primary tested drug ratio (61.7% vs. 93.6%), targets abundance (32.9% vs. 69.6%), and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T, 0.7% vs. 7.1%). Conclusion    Compared with the United States, China should pay more attention to innovative drug investigations in early phase of clinical studies, especially novel immune agents, vaccines, and CAR-T.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prevalence study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article