Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of Antinuclear Antibody and Antinuclear Antibody Spectrum in Lymphoma Treatment / 中国实验血液学杂志
Journal of Experimental Hematology ; (6): 861-865, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-827195
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the significance of antinuclear antibody and antinuclear antibody spectrum in the stage and prognosis of lymphoma patients.@*METHODS@#79 cases of lymphoma (lymphoma group) treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University and 50 cases of healthy people (control group) were selected. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were detected by indirect innmunofluorescence and ANA spectrums were detected by linear Western blot, the expression level of ANA and ANA spectrum in the two groups were analyzed. The lymphoma group was divided into the positive and the negative group according to ANA level, the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), white blood cell (WBC), disease type, stage and prognosis of the two groups were compared.@*RESULTS@#In the lymphoma group, the positive rate of ANA was 48.1%, while the positive rate was 8.0% in the health control group, both of them showed statistically significant (χ=22.42, P<0.05). ANA fluorescence karyotype in lymphoma group was mainly speckle type. In the Lymphoma group, the positive rate of ANA spectrum was 29.1%, while the positive rate in the control group was 4.0%, both of them showed statistically significant (χ=12.36, P<0.05). The target antigen distribution of ANA spectrum in the lymphoma group was relatively complex, mainly RO52 and SSA, while that in the control group was simple. The positive rate of ANA in lymphoma patients showed increased with age, the titer was mainly 1∶100 low titer positive, the positive rate of ANA in female patients was higher than that in male patients; The average count±standard deviation of LDH and WBC in the ANA positive and negative group were (253.67±255.85) U/L, (218.18±208.34) U/L, (6.34±3.31)×10/L and (6.81±3.91)×10/L respectively, which showed no statistical significance between the two groups (t=0.59 P>0.05; t=0.57 P>0.05); B-cell lymphoma was the main disease in both groups, which accounted for 81.6% (31/38) and 68.3% (28/41) respectively; while in B-cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the main lymphoma. For the patients with B-cell lymphoma, the patients at stage IV in ANA positive group was 58.1% (18/31), while that in the ANA negative group was 28.6% (8 / 28), and both of them showed statistically significant (χ=5.19, P<0.05). Follow-up showed that the survival rate of the patients in ANA negative group was higher than that in ANA positive group, which showed statistically significant difference (P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The postive rate of antinuclear antibody and antinuclear antibody spectrum are higher in lymphoma patients, which have considerable significance for the stage and prognosis of lymphoma treatment.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Prognosis / Blotting, Western / Antibodies, Antinuclear / L-Lactate Dehydrogenase / Lymphoma Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Experimental Hematology Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Prognosis / Blotting, Western / Antibodies, Antinuclear / L-Lactate Dehydrogenase / Lymphoma Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Experimental Hematology Year: 2020 Type: Article