Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: A propensity score-matched study / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)
Asian Journal of Andrology ; (6): 612-617, 2019.
Article in Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-842519
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (TRBx) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). We enrolled 2962 men who underwent transrectal (n = 1216) or transperineal (n = 1746) systematic 12-core prostate biopsy. Clinical data including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and prostate volume (PV) were recorded. To minimize confounding, we performed propensity score-matching analysis. We measured and compared PCa detection rates between TRBx and TPBx, which were stratified by clinical characteristics and Gleason scores. The effects of clinical characteristics on PCa detection rate were assessed by logistic regression. For all patients, TPBx detected a higher proportion of clinically significant PCa (P - 80 years (80.4% vs 56.5%, P = 0.004) and with PSA level 20.1-100.0 ng ml-1 (80.8% vs 69.1%, P = 0.040). In conclusion, TPBx was associated with a higher detection rate of clinically significant PCa than TRBx was; however, because of the high detection rate at certain ages and PSA levels, biopsy approaches should be optimized according to patents' clinical characteristics.
Key words
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: Zh Journal: Asian Journal of Andrology Year: 2019 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: Zh Journal: Asian Journal of Andrology Year: 2019 Type: Article