Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HPLC fingerprint and simultaneous determination of nine components in Taohong Siwu Decoction of classical prescriptions / 中草药
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs ; (24): 653-661, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-846626
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To establish chemical fingerprint and multi-components determination of 15 batches of Taohong Siwu Decoction (TSD), and provide reference for the improvement of its quality control.

Methods:

The separation was performed on Thermo Hypersil Gold C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) for gradient elution with methanol-0.1% phosphoric acid aqueous solution, flow rate 1.0 mL/min, column temperature 30 ℃, and detection wavelength 225 nm. The HPLC fingerprint was established and evaluated by the similarity evaluation system of TCM (version 2012A), and the difference of chemical information between 15 batches of different samples was evaluated by cluster analysis. Furthermore, the content of the nine active components in the sample was determined by HPLC multi-component wavelength switching method, with the partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS- DA) by SIMCA 14.1 software to find significant components of the quality between the batches.

Results:

The HPLC fingerprint of 15 batches of TSD was established. The similarity was greater than 0.96, and 35 common peaks were identified as gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, amygdalin, albiflorin, hydroxysafflor yellow A, paeoniflorin, ferulic acid, senkyunolide I, benzoylpaeoniflorin and ligustilide (corresponding to peaks 2, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 25, 31, and 32). The linearity relationships of gallic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, chlorogenic acid, albiflorin, hydroxysafflor yellow A, paeoniflorin, ferulic acid, verbascoside, and senkyunolide I (r ≥ 0.999 6) were good. The results of content determination respectively were 187.5-344.4, 6.2-154.8, 413.2-459.2, 507.5-923.5, 873.8-1 202.0, 2 122.3-2 782.9, 59.2-121.3, 6.4-26.9, and 38.9-79.6 μg/g, respectively, including higher content of paeoniflorin, hydroxysafflor yellow A, and albiflorin. Furthermore, 15 batches of samples from different origins were classified into three categories. Using PLS-DA analysis, the content determination result showed that paeoniflorin, albiflorin, hydroxysafflor yellow A, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural were the four components that affected the quality of different batches of TSD.

Conclusion:

HPLC fingerprint combined with multi-components determination is suitable for quality control and evaluation of TSD preparation.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs Year: 2020 Type: Article