Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-term effectiveness comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall broken / 中国修复重建外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 1281-1287, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-856245
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the short-term effectiveness and safety of unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) with posterior wall broken.

Methods:

The clinical data of 68 patients with OVCF with posterior wall broken and without posterior ligament complex injury and spinal cord nerve injury between June 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different operative approaches, the patients were divided into two groups group A (36 cases received PKP via bilateral pedicle puncture) and group B (32 cases received PKP via unilateral pedicle paracentesis). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, fracture vertebra distribution, time from injury to operation, preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and height of injured vertebra ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and bone cement volume were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and ODI score were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation, at 1 day and 6 months after operation; the height of injured vertebra was measured on the lateral X-ray film, and the recovery height of injured vertebra at 1 day after operation and the loss height of injured vertebra at 6 months after operation were calculated; the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded.

Results:

The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and bone cement volume of group B were significantly less than those of group A ( P0.05). However, at 6 months after operation, the height of injured vertebra in group B was significantly lower than that in group A ( P0.05).

Conclusion:

Both bipedicular and unipedicular PKP can obtain satisfactory effectiveness for the treatment of OVCF with posterior wall broken, but the former may have advantages of lower cement leakage rate and less height loss.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article