Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ilaprazole Enteric-coated Tablets in the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer:A Rapid Health Technology Assessment / 中国药学杂志
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal ; (24): 1111-1116, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-857660
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To rapidly evaluate the efficacy, safety and economical efficiency of ilaprazole enteric-coated tablets in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, so as to provide evidence-based evidence for clinical rational drug use.

METHODS:

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang database and health technology assessment (HTA) organization websites were searched systematically. HTA reports, systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic studies comparing ilaprazole with other drugs for duodenal ulcer treatment were included. Qualitative and descriptive analysis were performed on the included studies.

RESULTS:

A total of 10 literatures were included, including five systematic reviews/Meta-analysis and six pharmacoeconomic research (one systematic reviews/Meta-analysis also carried out pharmacoeconomic research). The efficacy of ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) was comparable to other PPIs regimens in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, and there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) and ilaprazole (5 mg•d-1). Compared with H2 receptor antagonists, ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) was significantly better than ranitidine and famotidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. In terms of safety, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) and other PPIs or H2 receptor antagonists. In terms of the economics of treating duodenal ulcer, ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) was not economical compared to esmeprazole (40 mg•d-1), while ilaprazole (5 mg•d-1) was more economical than rabeprazole (10 mg•d-1).

CONCLUSION:

Ilaprazole enteric-coated tablets are safe and effective in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, not inferior to other PPIs, and have economic advantages compared with rabeprazole. Because ilaprazole (10 mg•d-1) and ilaprazole (5 mg•d-1) have comparable efficacy, a low-dose regimen could be considered clinically to further improve its safety and cost performance. At the same time, it is necessary to further carry out clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies of low-dose ilaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcer to improve the relevant evidence.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Health technology assessment / Qualitative research Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Health technology assessment / Qualitative research Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal Year: 2020 Type: Article