Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of laparoscopic exploration and choledocholithotomy in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery / 国际外科学杂志
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 374-378, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-863344
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the feasibility, safety and early prognosis of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy in patients with previous history of upper abdominal surgery.

Methods:

From January 2014 to December 2018, the clinical data of 156 patients with previous history of upper abdominal surgery in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery of Central Hospital of Edong Healthcare Group were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 84 cases with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction were allocated into laparoscopic group, 72 cases with open common bile duct exploration and stone extraction were allocated into open group.In the laparoscopic group, there were 50 males and 34 females, aged 42-83 (66.4±17.8) years; In the open group, there were 40 males and 32 females, aged 45-82 (64.2±16.9) years. The operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, first defecation time and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. The postoperative pain score and the incidence of early complications (bile leakage, abdominal distention, ascites, epigastric pain, residual stones) were compared between the two groups. The measurement data subject to normal distribution are represented by ( Mean± SD), the independent sample t test was used for group comparison, and the chi-square test was used for counting data comparison.

Results:

The laparoscopic group was converted to open surgery in 3 cases, and there was no perioperative death. In the laparoscopic group, the operation time, the intraoperative bleeding volume, the first defecation time, the postoperative hospital stay wee (122.8 ± 28.1) min, (80.3 ± 13.7) mL, (1.8 ± 0.3) d, (7.7 ± 0.8) d, and (146.6 ± 33.5) min, (125.8 ± 19.6) mL, (2.7 ± 0.6) d, (9.1± 1.2) d in the open group; The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05); On the 2nd and 4th day after operation, the abdominal pain scores in laparoscopic group were (3.6 ± 1.3) scores and (2.3 ± 0.7) scores, and (5.5±1.6) scores, (4.2±1.3) scores in the open group, the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the open group ( P<0.05); The incidence of early postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was 32.1% (27/84), and in the open group was 47.2% (34/72), but the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05).

Conclusions:

For patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochoscopy are safe and feasible, The operation has the advantages of minimally invasive and less bleeding, which can relieve postoperative pain, shorten postoperative hospital stay, and will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, It′s good for quick recovery. It is suitable for the promotion of grass-roots hospitals.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: International Journal of Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: International Journal of Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article