Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of innovation ability training of military medical postgraduates based on Kirkpatrick model / 中华医学教育探索杂志
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research ; (12): 373-379, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-865817
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To comprehensively evaluate all aspects of innovation ability training of military medical postgraduates based on Kirkpatrick model.

Methods:

Through scientifically choosing alternative evaluating indexes of four levels (postgraduates' satisfaction with the training in their universities, the intensity of their study motivation, level and distribution characteristics of their innovation abilities, innovation achievements such as published papers) and conducting questionnaire survey and data collection, we comprehensively evaluated the training effects of 804 postgraduates' innovation abilities in a certain military medical university.

Results:

①The first level (Reaction) The postgraduates were generally satisfied with the innovation ability training of their university (the percentage of students who were "Very Satisfied" plus "Satisfied" was 61.2%), and their satisfaction towards their supervisor (4.18±0.84), which was assessed with likert 5-level method, was greater than that towards the educational management (3.64±0.89) and course teaching (3.59±0.86) in their university. ②The second level (Learning) The study motivation of most of the postgraduates were moderate (57.5%, 463/804). ③The third level (Behavior) The percentage of postgraduates with "average innovation ability" was 64.4% (518/804) and students with "good innovation ability" was 34.3% (276/804). The internal attributes of students' innovation ability were primarily Challenge (78.66±9.84) and Curiosity (76.46±10.38), and Imagination (65.36±11.44) was the lowest. ④The fourth level (Achievement) Most of the papers of postgraduates were published in Chinese core journals (average 0.42±0.83); 46.5% (365/804) of the students appraised the innovation in their research papers as "deficient"; 32.2% (259/804) of the students participated only one research project; and 38.7% (311/804) of the students appraised the academic nature in the research projects they participated as "average".

Conclusion:

The application of Kirkpatrick model addressed the inconsistency of evaluation indexes of innovation ability training for postgraduates in the university. Specific analyses of the 4 levels provided more information for the innovation ability training for postgraduates in universities, and also deeply demonstrated effect and significance of the training.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Year: 2020 Type: Article