Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of gradual dural decompression in treatment of severe traumatic brain injury / 中华创伤杂志
Chinese Journal of Trauma ; (12): 526-530, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-867742
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the effect of gradual dural decompression(GDD)in preventing intraoperative encephalocele in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods:

A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 78 patients with severe TBI admitted to Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2015 to October 2018, including 55 males and 23 females, aged 15-68 years with an average age of 38.2 years. Thirty-eight patients were treated by GDD (GDD group). During the operation, the hematoma was cleared by opening a window in the area with more hematoma, then gradually cleared in the area without opening a window. Finally, the dural "junction" was cut and the skull was closed quickly after covering the dural patch. The other 40 patients were operated by fast open dural (FOD) operation (FOD group). The incidence of intraoperative encephalocele, intracranial pressure data at the time, 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after operation, incidence of delayed intracranial hematoma and glasgow outcome score (GOS) at 3 months after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results:

All patients (except for 26 deaths) were followed up for 3-14 months, with an average of 8 months. None had intraoperative encephalocele in GDD group, compared to 8 patients in FOD group ( P<0.05). Intracranial pressure in GDD group was respective (18.4±3.6)mmHg, (20.4±4.0)mmHg, (27.7±4.6)mmHg and (28.3±4.5)mmHg at the time, 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after operation, showing no significant differences compared to FOD group [(19.1±3.4)mmHg, (20.9±3.9)mmHg, (27.0±3.5)mmHg, (27.6±3.4)mmHg, respectively] ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of delayed intracranial hematoma between the two groups [16% (6/38) in GDD group and 16% (5/32) in FOD group (except 8 cases of intraoperative encephalocele)] ( P>0.05). Three months after operation, the good rate of GOS score of GDD group was 61% (23/28) higher than that of FOD group [28% (11/40)], and the mortality rate of GDD group was 21% (8/38) lower than that of FOD group [45% (18/40)] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in medium severe disability and plant survival rate ( P>0.05).

Conclusions:

For patients with severe TBI, compared with FOD, GDD is more effective in reducing the incidence of intraoperative encephalocele, improving the prognosis and decreasing mortality.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Trauma Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Trauma Year: 2020 Type: Article