Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of artificial intelligence in screening the four-chamber view of fetal echocardiography / 中华超声影像学杂志
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography ; (12): 668-672, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-868070
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the value of artificial intelligence in screening normal or abnormal four-chamber view of the fetal heart.

Methods:

Selecting 3 996 pictures of normal and abnormal end systolic four chamber views and 450 video clips from the database of Beijing Key Laboratory of Fetal Heart Disease Maternal and Fetal Medicine Research in Beijing Anzhen Hospital as training set, test set and verification set to train, test and verify DGACNN model. ①Comparing DGACNN, DGACNN-ALOCC and other classification models(Densenet, Resnet50, InceptionV3, InceptionResnetV2) to detect the model with the most advanced level by recognizing 200 normal pictures and 200 abnormal pictures. ②Fetal echocardiographers were divided into three groups according to their experiences primary, intermediate and advanced, 3 doctors in each group, and comparing the average score between each group or three groups and DGACNN by recognizing 100 normal pictures and 100 abnormal pictures.

Results:

①When the the false positive rate(FPR) was in the range of 20%, the recognition accuracy of DGACNN was the highest with 0.850, the recognition accuracy of other models were DGACNN-ALOCC 0.835, Densenet 0.780, Resnet50 0.700, InceptionV3 0.670, InceptionResnetV2 0.650, respectively. ②When FPR was in the range of 20%, the area under ROC curve of DGACNN was the largest with 0.881, the area under ROC curve of other models were DGACNN-ALOCC 0.864, Densenet 0.850, Resnet50 0.822, Inceptionv3 0.779, InceptionResnetV2 0.703, respectively. ③When the FPR was in the range of 20%, the average recognition accuracy of the senior fetal echocardiographer group was the highest with 0.863, followed by DGACNN 0.840, which was higher than the average recognition accuracy of the primary and intermediate groups with 0.760, 0.807; the average recognition accuracy of DGACNN was higher than the total average recognition accuracy of the primary, intermediate and advanced groups with 0.810.

Conclusions:

Artificial intelligence is accessible in screening four chamber view of fetal echocardiography, with high recognition accuracy.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Screening study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography Year: 2020 Type: Article