Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the replacement of obstructed double J tube in ureter under X-ray guidance / 中华放射学杂志
Chinese Journal of Radiology ; (12): 1207-1211, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-868390
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the feasibility and safety of the X-ray guided obstructive double J tube replacement in ureter.

Methods:

The clinical data of 44 patients with double J tube obstruction who underwent double J tube replacement from April 2016 to August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among the 44 cases, there were 3 males and 41 females, aged from 27.0 to 70.0 (54.6±11.2) years. The time since last double J tube placement, the method of transurethral remove of double J tube, the method of double J tube replacement, the location of double J tube obstruction and postoperative complications were collected, and the success rate of operation was calculated. According to the different positions of calcium salt deposition in double J tubes, the obstructive double J tubes were divided into bladder end type, renal pelvis end type, two-end type and whole partial type. The replacement method was differentiated according to different types of double J tube obstruction. The cut-off end method was to cut off the obstructed bladder end of double J tube by scissors, and the internal unobstructed double J tube could be seen. The guide wire could be introduced into the renal pelvis through the double J tube, and the new double J tube could be replaced. This method was only used for bladder end type double J tube obstruction. The thine guide wire method was to replace the common guide wire which could not pass through the renal pelvis end obstruction with the microguide wire, so that it could pass through the end of the double J tube of the renal pelvis end obstruction or through the side hole, enter into the renal pelvis, withdraw the original double J tube, and then replace the new double J tube. This method was suitable for renal pelvis end type double J tube obstruction, or combined with cut-off end method for two-end type double J tube obstruction. In the auxiliary sheath method, the obstructed double J tube was used as the support, the vascular sheath tube was sent into the ureter, and the guide wire was sent to the renal pelvis through the sheath tube to replace the new double J tube. This method was suitable for all types of double J tube obstruction.

Results:

A total of 47 X-ray-guided double J tube replacements were performed in 44 patients. In the removal of double J tube, 37 cases of direct method and 10 cases of indirect method were used, and the overall success rate of double J tube removal was 100% (47/47). The time from the last double J tube placement was (4.2±1.3) months. There were 23 cases of bladder end type obstruction, 8 cases of renal pelvis end obstruction, 5 cases of two-end type obstruction, and 11 cases of whole partial type obstruction.The success rate of replacing double J tubes by cut-off end method, thin guide wire method and auxiliary sheath method was 76.0% (19/25), 50.0% (2/4) and 77.8% (14/18), respectively. After the failure of the cut-off end method or the thin guide wire method, 4 cases were further replaced by the thin guide wire method or auxiliary sheath method, and 3 cases were successful. Therefore, the overall success rate of double J tube replacement was 80.9% (38/47). The double J tubes were inserted by percutanous pyelostomy in 9 patients who failed to replace double J tube successfully. Among the 44 cases, there were 4 cases of urethral orifice pain and discomfort, and 2 cases of gross hematuria, all of which relieved spontaneously.

Conclusion:

It is feasible and safe to replace the obstructive double J tube in ureter under X-ray guidance.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Practice guideline Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiology Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Practice guideline Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiology Year: 2020 Type: Article