Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of different unipolar electrocoagulation power on pathological renal injury in porcine suture-free partial nephrectomy / 中华泌尿外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 619-623, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-869721
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the efficacy of different unipolar electrocoagulation power on pathological injury of porcine kidney suffering suture-free partial nephrectomy (SFPN).

Methods:

From April 2018 to July 2018, nine Guizhou pigs were selected, with an average age of 3 years and an average weight of 48 kg. According to different hemostatic power of unipolar electrocoagulation during open partial nephrectomy, they were divided into three groups(60W group, 80W group, and 100W group), with 3 in each group. The left kidney was exposed with a surgical incision, parallel to the lumbosacral muscle.The left renal artery was clamped and about 2 cm renal tissue was excised at the middle pole of the left kidney. 60W, 80W and 100W were used by unipolar electrocoagulation for hemostasis until no bleeding occurred after the artery clamp was released. The total ischemia time was controlled within 20 min. Temperature was measured by a multi-channel thermometer probe which was inserted into the healthy kidney tissue at a distance of 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm away from the unipolar electrocoagulation hook, and the upper pole of the kidney far away from the operation area. The time of operation, the volume of renal bleeding, the time of hemostasis and the temperature were recorded. On the 7th day after operation, the left kidneys were taken and the pathological changes were observed by toluidine blue staining.

Results:

All operations were completed safely and successfully. The operation time in 60W group, 80W group, and 100W group was (41.2±5.5)min, (35.1±3.7)min, (31.3±2.2)min , respectively. There was no significant difference of operation time among those group ( P>0.05). The blood loss of renal was (35.3±4.1)ml, (21.4±4.7)ml, (15.3±4.1)ml, respectively. The blood loss in the 100W group and 80W group was less than that in the 60W group ( P<0.05). And the blood loss in the 100W group was less than that in the 80W group ( P<0.05). The hemostasis time was (15.2±1.9)min, (10.1±1.4)min, (6.4±0.8)min. The hemostasis time in the 100W and 80W groups was less than that in the 60W group ( P<0.05). And the hemostasis time in the 100W group was less than that in the 80W group ( P<0.05). At the place of 10 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook, the temperature in the three groups were (33.1±1.1)℃, (34.0±1.0)℃, (34.3±0.6)℃, which was not significantly different from that of the respective upper poles. And there was no significant difference between the three groups( P>0.05). At the place of 5 mm and 2 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook, the temperature in the 100W group (41.7±1.3)℃, (61.4±6.4)℃ and the 80W group (38.6±2.4)℃, (50.3±6.0)℃ was higher than that in the 60W group (36.9±4.1)℃, (42.0±4.7)℃, and the temperature in 100W group is higher than that in 80W group ( P<0.05). When the power was 60W, 80W or 100W, the temperature in the place 10 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook was less than that in the place 5 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook ( P<0.05), and the temperature of the place 5 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook was lower than that of the place 2 mm away from the electrocoagulation hook ( P<0.05). The total pathological injury depth of wounds in 60W, 80W, 100W group was (7 323±50)μm, (8 119±100)μm, (8 896±40)μm, respectively. The depth in 100W group and 80W group was deeper than that in 60W group ( P<0.05), and the depth in 100W group was deeper than that in 80W group ( P<0.05).

Conclusions:

In SFPN, the hemostatic effect of three different monopolar electrocoagulation output power is satisfactory. With the increase of power, the hemostasis speed is faster. However, the temperature of surrounding healthy renal tissue would be higher, and the total pathological injury depth would be deeper.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Urology Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Urology Year: 2020 Type: Article