Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative study on safety and feasibility between robot splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy / 中华普通外科杂志
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 30-33, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-870409
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of robot splenectomy.Methods 65 patients undergoing robotic or laparoscopic splenectomy at No.940 Hospital of Chinese people's Liberation Army Joint Service Support Force from Jan 2015 to Sep 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Results The operation time and total hospitalization cost of robot spleen resection group and laparoscopic splenectomy group were [(167 ± 34) min vs.(123 ± 24) min,t =8.554,P =0.00] and (73 002 ± 21 009) yuan vs.(42 095 ± 9 999) yuan,(t =6.484,P =0.00),respectively.In laparoscopy group,3 cases were converted to laparotomy.In the subgroup of splenic hilum thickness ≥ 5 cm,the intraoperative bleeding volume of robot group and laparoscopic group was (145 ± 67) ml vs.(263 ± 180) ml,(t =-2.195,P =0.04).There were significant differences in VAS score (3 ±1) vs.(4 ±1),(t=2.175,P=0.04).Conclusion Robotic splenectomy is safe and feasible.For patients with splenomegaly,robot surgery has more minimally invasive advantages than laparoscopy,but it is expensive and time-consuming.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2020 Type: Article