Clinical Nurses' Knowledge and Visual Differentiation Ability in Pressure Ulcer Classification System and Incontinence-associated Dermatitis
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
;
: 526-535, 2013.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-87439
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study was done to compare clinical nurses' knowledge and visual differentiation diagnostic ability for the pressure ulcer classification system (PUCS) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD).METHODS:
A convenience sample of 602 nurses took the pressure ulcer classification system and incontinence-associated dermatitis knowledge test (PUCS & IAD KT) and completed the visual differentiation tool (VDT), consisting of 21 photographs with clinical information.RESULTS:
The overall mean score for correct answers was 14.5 (+/-3.2) in PUCS & IAD KT and 11.15 (+/-4.9) in PUCS & IAD VDT. Incorrect responses were most common for statements related to stage III, IAD for PUCS & IAD KT, and suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI), unstageable, and stage III for PUCS & IAD VDT. Significant correlations were found between PUCS & IAD KT and VDT (r=.48, p<.001). Factors affecting scores for PUCS & IAD VDT were PUCS & IAD KT, frequency of pressure ulcer, IAD management and participation in wound care education programs.CONCLUSION:
Results indicate that nurses have an overall understanding of PUCS & IAD, but low visual differentiation ability regarding stage III, SDTI, and unstageable ulcers. Continuing education is needed to further improve knowledge and visual differentiation ability for PUCS & IAD.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Urinary Incontinence
/
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
/
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Pressure Ulcer
/
Dermatitis
/
Education, Continuing
/
Educational Measurement
/
Fecal Incontinence
/
Nurses
Type of study:
Qualitative research
Limits:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Year:
2013
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS