Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?
Singapore medical journal
;
: 34-38, 2021.
Article
in English
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-877461
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION@#Two strategies are available for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis - clinical risk factor-based screening and routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation. In our hospital, we switched from the former to the latter approach in 2014.@*METHODS@#We compared the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis during 2001-2015 between infants born to pregnant women who were screened for GBS colonisation and those born to women who were not screened.@*RESULTS@#Among 41,143 live births, there were nine cases of early-onset GBS sepsis. All infants with GBS sepsis were born to pregnant women who were not screened for GBS colonisation. The incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis among infants of women who were not screened was 0.41 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.77) when compared to infants of women who were screened, for whom the sepsis incidence was zero per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0-0.19; p = 0.005).@*CONCLUSION@#Our data suggests that routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation is a better preventive strategy for early-onset GBS sepsis in neonates when compared to clinical risk factor-based screening.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Etiology study
/
Risk factors
/
Screening study
Language:
English
Journal:
Singapore medical journal
Year:
2021
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS