Comparison of Reusable Models in Pericardiocentesis Simulation Training
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
; : 971-977, 2020.
Article
in En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-877707
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION@#Pericardiocentesis is a potentially life-saving procedure. We compared two low-cost models-an agar-based model and a novel model, Centesys-in terms of ultrasound image quality and realism, effectiveness of the model, and learners' confidence and satisfaction after training.@*METHODS@#In this pilot randomised 2x2 crossover trial stratified by physician seniority, participants were assigned to undergo pericardiocentesis training either with the agar-based or Centesys model first, followed by the other model. Participants were asked to rate their confidence in performing ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis, clarity and realism of cardiac structures on ultrasound imaging, and satisfaction on a 7-point Likert scale before and after training with each model.@*RESULTS@#Twenty participants with median postgraduate year of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.75-6) years were recruited. Pre-training, participants rated themselves a median score of 2.5 (IQR 2-4) for level of confidence in performing pericardiocentesis, which improved to 5 (IQR 4-6) post-training with Centesys (@*CONCLUSION@#Centesys achieved greater learner satisfaction as compared to the agar-based model, and was an effective tool for teaching ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis and drain insertion.
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Type of study:
Clinical_trials
/
Prognostic_studies
Language:
En
Journal:
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Year:
2020
Type:
Article