Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous transversus abdominis plane block versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis / 国际外科学杂志
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 226-232,F3, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-882474
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the safety and efficacy of continuous transversus abdominis plane (CTAP) block and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in abdominal surgery postoperatively.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI and other English and Chinese databases were searched since their establishment to February 2021 with "continuous/modified, transversus/transverse abdominis plane block, TAP block, patient controlled analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia, patient controlled intravenous analgesia, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, PCA/PCIA/IV-PCA" as the search keywords. According to the analgesia treatment methods, patients were divided into continuous transversus abdominis plane block group (CTAP group) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (PCIA group). Review Manager 5.4 software was used to conduct a Meta-analysis on outcome indicators such as postoperative nausea and (or) vomiting (PONV), dizziness, pain score and recovery status after abdominal surgery. Risk ratio ( RR) was calculated for counting data, Mean ± SD was calculated for measurement data. Heterogeneity was measured by I2, and related data were analyzed by using either a fixed effects model or a random effects model.

Results:

(1) The results of literature search A total of 6 randomized controlled trials, including 2 published in English and 4 published in Chinese were analyzed, involving 479 patients. The results of the Meta-

analysis:

Compared with PCIA, CTAP block had lower incidence of PONV ( RR=0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.62, P<0.01), lower incidence of dizziness ( RR=0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, P=0.02), lower pain scores on movement at 24 h ( MD=-0.75, 95% CI -1.42--0.08, P=0.03) and 48 h ( MD=-0.68, 95% CI -1.05--0.31, P<0.001) postoperatively, and earlier time of first mobilization ( MD=-0.49, 95% CI -0.69--0.30, P<0.001) and first exhaust ( MD=-10.47, 95% CI -13.53--7.41, P<0.001), with statistically significant differences. However, there were no statistically significant differences in pain scores at rest at 24 h ( MD=-0.25, 95% CI -0.57-0.08, P=0.14) and 48 h ( MD=-0.15, 95% CI -0.39-0.09, P=0.22) postoperatively and postoperative length of hospital stay ( MD=-1.01, 95% CI -2.28-0.26, P=0.12).

Conclusion:

CTAP block is a relatively safe and effective analgesic method, and it′s more consistent with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and can be recommended as an alternative method of PCIA.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: International Journal of Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: International Journal of Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article