Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Central foveal distribution based on posterior scleral morphologies in high myopia / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)
International Eye Science ; (12): 1504-1507, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-886424
ABSTRACT
@#

AIM:

To describe the distribution of the central fovea macula in different zones of the eye fundus and different posterior scleral morphologies in high myopia(HM).<p>

METHODS:

From May 2016 and February 2018, a total of 207 eyes(126 cases)with HM were selected and divided into three groups according to Curtin's posterior scleral staphyloma classifications group A(Types Ⅰ and Ⅱ), group B(Type Ⅲ), and group C(Types Ⅶ, Ⅸ, and Ⅹ). The posterior zone of the fundus was divided into three zones zones 1, 2 and 3. The horizontal distance between the central fovea and the vertical line pass of the optic nerve head(ONH)center(HDFCO), the vertical distance between the fovea and the horizontal line pass of the ONH center(VDFCO), and vision were tested. The fovea position in different posterior scleral morphologies groups were investigated.<p>

RESULTS:

In zone 1, 3 eyes were all from group A(1.5%). In zone 2, 117 eyes were from group A(56.5%), 15 eyes were from group B(7.2%), and 13 eyes were from group C(6.3%). The HDFCO was 5 037±507 μm, 4 771±509 μm, and 5 585±773 μm in groups A, B, and C, respectively(<i>F</i>=8.38, <i>P</i><0.01). The VDFCO values were 615±297 μm, 643±322 μm, and 504±363 μm(<i>F</i>=0.87, <i>P</i>=0.41). In zone 3, 43 eyes were from group A(20.7%), 7 eyes were from group B(3.4%), and 9 eyes were from group C(4.4%). The HDFCO was 5 048±683 μm, 4 444±540 μm, and 5 293±840 μm in groups A, B, and C, respectively(<i>F</i>=3.13, <i>P</i>=0.05). The VDFCO values were 1 385±484 μm, 1 225±201 μm, and 1 664±318 μm(<i>F</i>=2.18, <i>P</i>=0.12). The mean best corrected visual acuity of HM group was LogMAR 4.87±0.22 and 4.77±0.27 in zone 2 and zone 3, respectively(<i>t</i>=-1.55, <i>P</i>=0.12).<p>

CONCLUSION:

The position of the central fovea changes slightly with different posterior scleral morphologies in HM and has no effects on best corrected visual acuity.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: English Journal: International Eye Science Year: 2021 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: English Journal: International Eye Science Year: 2021 Type: Article