Efficacy of plasma exchange combined with dual plasma molecular adsorption system in the treatment of patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure / 中华传染病杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of plasma exchange combined with dual plasma molecular adsorption system (PE+ DPMAS) in treating patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF).Methods:A total of 114 HBV-ACLF patients admitted to The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University in Luzhou City and treated with PE+ DPMAS from June 2014 to January 2018 were included. According to different basis of liver diseases, there were type A, type B and type C. The laboratory data and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) of patients before PE+ DPMAS and 48 h after treatment, and the prognosis of patients at 90 d were retrospectively analyzed. Independent sample t test, paired sample t test, nonparametric test, variance analysis and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The clinical stages among patients with type A (22 cases), type B (39 cases) and type C (53 cases) were mainly early (seven, 17, 22 cases) and mid-stages (eight, 14, 20 cases). Before PE+ DPMAS, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), prealbumin (pAlb), albumin (Alb), creatinine (Cr), total bilirubin (TBil), prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin activity (PTA), and MELD were all not statistically different among the patients in the three groups (all P>0.05). After PE+ DPMAS treatment, ALT, TBil, PT, INR, MELD, pAlb, Alb, and PTA in patients with type A were statistically different compared with those before treatment ( Z=5.104, t=5.555, 4.974, 4.481, 7.984, -5.396, -2.784 and -6.752, respectively, all P<0.05). ALT, TBil, PT, INR and MELD in patients with type B were significantly decreased, while pAlb and PTA were significantly increased after treatment ( Z=-5.428, t=4.867, 4.405, 4.179, 6.186, -6.290 and -4.533, respectively, all P<0.01). ALT, pAlb and TBil in patients with type C after PE+ DPMAS treatment were significantly different from those before treatment ( Z=-5.723, t=-2.525 and 2.462, respectively, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Cr of the three groups before and after treatment (all P>0.05). The patients with type A had the shortest hospital stay ((17.95±5.92) d), while the patients with type C had the longest stay ((25.77±7.02) d). The hospital stay of patients with type B was (21.79±6.72) d. The difference was statistically significant ( F=11.317, P<0.01). After 90 d follow-up, four patients (18.18%) with type A died, nine patients (23.08%) with type B died, and 25 patients (47.17%)with type C died. The difference was statistically significant ( χ2=8.615, P=0.013). Conclusion:HBV-ACLF patients with type A and type B have better prognosis after PE+ DPMAS treatment compared to patients with type C who are in the decompensated stage of liver cirrhosis.