Assessment of left ventricular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients by speckle tracking layer-specific strain combined with myocardial work technique / 中华超声影像学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To assess the changes of left ventricular systolic function and global myocardial work in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients by speckle tracking layer-specific strain combined with myocardial work technique and explore the diagnostic value of each parameter for HFpEF.Methods:From December 2019 to December 2020, 38 HFpEF patients (HFpEF group) and 38 healthy individuals with age- and sex-matched (control group) were enrolled consecutively in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Conventional ultrasound parameters were collected. Layer-specific strain and myocardial work techniques were used to obtain the global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the left ventricular endocardium, mid-myocardium, and epicardium (GLSendo, GLSmid, GLSepi), global myocardial work index (GWI), global myocardial work efficiency (GWE), global constructive work (GCW), and global wasted work (GWW). The absolute difference of GLS(&Delta;GLS) between endocardium and epicardium were calculate.All parameters were analyzed statistically. ROC curves were plotted to compare the effectiveness of layer-specific strain and myocardial work parameters in predicting left ventricular systolic function impairment in HFpEF patients.Results:①Left atrial diameter, interventricular septum at end-diastole, left ventricular posterior wall at end-diastole, relative wall thickness, left ventricular mass index, and average early diastolic peak velocity (E)/early diastolic tissue velocity (e′) in HFpEF group were significantly higher compared with control subjects, while late diastolic peak velocity (A), E/A, and e′ were significantly lower (all P<0.05); E, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, fraction shortening, and left ventricular ejection fraction were not different between HFpEF and control groups (all P>0.05). ②The global longitudinal strain of the left ventricule was highest in the endocardium and lowest in the epicardium. ③Compared with control subjects, HFpEF patients demonstrated significantly decreased GLSendo, GLSmid, GLSepi, &Delta;GLS, GWI, GWE, GCW and increased GWW (all P<0.01). ④The ROC results showed that the area under the curve of &Delta;GLS and GWE for predicting left ventricular contractile function impairment in HFpEF group, was 0.884 and 0.882, respectively; The cutoff values were -5.8% and 95%; The sensitivity were 84.2% and 71.1%, and the specificity was 84.2% and 89.5%, respectively. ⑤The ROC curve of combining the two technologies showed that the maximum area under the curve of the &Delta;GLS in tandem with GWE was 0.944, the sensitivity was 81.6%, and the specificity was 97.4%. Conclusions:Both speckle tracking layer-specific strain and myocardial work techniques can sensitively detect left ventricular myocardial function impairment in HFpEF patients at an early stage. &Delta;GLS and GWE are more reliable indexes for predicting left ventricular systolic function damage in HFpEF patients. Combining the two techniques can improve the diagnostic performance in HFpEF patients.