A comparative study of orthopaedic robot and O-arm navigation to pelvic fractures / 中华骨科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:By comparing the clinical effect of minimally invasive hollow screw internal fixation Assisted by orthopedic robot (TiRobot) and O-arm navigation in the treatment of pelvic fractures, and practicability and security of both treatments were evaluated.Methods:Retrospective analysis of data of 42 cases of Tile C type pelvic fractures was employed during June 2017 to June 2020. Among them, 32 cases, twenty-four men, eight women, aged 34±6.2 years (range 24-68 years), were treated with percutaneous screw fixation guided by O-arm X wire instrument. According to Tile classification, there were 3 cases of C1.1 type, 8 cases of C1.2 type and 21case of C1.3 type. According to the Denis classification of sacral fractures, 17 cases were in zone I, and 8 cases in zone II. Ten patients, eight males and two females, aged 36±5.2 years (range 19-62 years) were treated by percutaneous screw fixation assisted by orthopedic robot. According to Tile classification, there were 1 case of C1.1 type, 2 cases of C1.2 type and 7 cases of C1.3 type. According to the Denis classification of sacral fractures, there were 5cases in zone I, 2 cases in zone II. For those who got obviously displaced pelvic fractures, Starr frames were used and then internal fixation was used to fix pelvic anterior ring and posterior ring injury respectively. Based on the times of needle adjustments, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, good screw position and incidence of complications two groups were statistically analysed. Matta score was employed to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, while the Majeed score was employed to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Through the two groups of cases guide needle adjustment times, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, screw position excellent and good rate and the incidence of complications, which were statistically analyzed.Results:All screw positions were confirmed by CT scan after operation. The average time required for each screw placement of the O-arm group was 7.36±2.63 s, of the robot group was 6.80±3.20 s, so difference was not statistically significant ( P<0.05). An average of screw adjustments per one screw was 1.56±0.02 times by O-arm, and by the robot group was 0.34±0.06 times, so differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( P>0.05). The average operating time of O-arm group was 53.86±15.06 min, while the robot group was 52.52±15.14 min, so differences between the two groups were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Position distribution of screw placement in two groups, all screws in O-arm group of position evaluations were excellent, excellent rate was 100%, all screw position evaluations by robot were excellent, excellent rate was 100%, so difference in screw distribution between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). All cases were followed up for 6-12 months. Fracture healing time 34.6±8.6 weeks for O-arm group, 33.4±9.4 weeks for robot group. Comparison between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Majeed score of O-arm group was 55-87, including Excellence of 17 cases, goodness of 9, fairness of 6. The rate of excellence and goodness was 81.2%, while robot group was 76-95, and that were excellent 7 cases,1 good, and the excellent and good rate was 80%, there was no significant difference between Matta and Majeed score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of complications between the two groups were no statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Orthopedic robot system and O-arm navigation system assisted by percutaneous hollow screw fixation treatment of pelvic anterior and posterior ring injury, which are accurate, safe, minimally invasive, can reduce radiation damage to patients and surgeons. The efficacy were satisfactory. Both treatments are ideal for minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures, and the orthopedic robot have advantages of being programmed, standardized, stable and it’s learning curve is shorter.