Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant concurrent radiochemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis / 中华胸心血管外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 526-532, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-912318
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To systematic review the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods:

Literature search was performed from Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, Wanfang Data, CNKI and Chongqing VIP. The clinical controlled studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in the treatment of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was searched. Relevant outcome indicators were analyzed by Revman 5.3 statistical software.

Results:

Nine studies were included, with a total of 1, 369 patients. Compared with the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy had lower overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years( OR=0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.86, P<0.05; OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, P<0.05) , lower pathological complete remission rate( OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.45, P<0.05)and R0 resection rate( OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.68, P<0.05), The total postoperative complication rate is similar( OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.75-1.51, P>0.05).

Conclusion:

Neoadjuvant concurrent radiochemotherapy maybe superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article