Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections / 中国结合医学杂志
Chinese journal of integrative medicine ; (12): 36-42, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-922573
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate whether skin tests are suitable to predict the allergy reactions induced by Chinese herbal injections (CHIs).@*METHODS@#The skin tests including skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT) and provocation tests including subcutaneous tests and intravenous tests were administered to 249 healthy subjects and 180 allergic patients for 3 CHIs, including ginkgolide injection, diterpene ginkgolide meglumine injection and Salvianolate lyophilized injection. The results of the provocation tests were used as the "gold standard" to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the skin tests.@*RESULTS@#The results did not show any significant differences between the healthy and allergy groups in both skin tests and provocation tests (P>0.05). The specificities of SPT and IDT were 0.976 and 0.797, respectively, and the sensitivities of both SPT and IDT were 0.@*CONCLUSION@#Skin tests are insufficient to predict the likelihood of allergic reactions resulting from CHIs. (ChiCTR-CPC-15006921).
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Intradermal Tests / Skin Tests / China / Sensitivity and Specificity / Hypersensitivity Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Chinese journal of integrative medicine Year: 2022 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Intradermal Tests / Skin Tests / China / Sensitivity and Specificity / Hypersensitivity Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Chinese journal of integrative medicine Year: 2022 Type: Article