Analysis of dynamic image features of tear film in dry eye patients / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the image features of dynamic changes of tear film break-up after corneal fluorescein staining(FL)combined with tear film lipid layer(TFLL)dynamic changes in patients with dry eye and its value of diagnosis in dry eye. METHODS: A prospective study. A total of 66 patients(132 eyes)with dry eye admitted to our hospital during September 2019 to December 2020 were divided area break-up group(17 cases, 28 eyes), circle break-up group(20 cases, 27 eyes), line break-up group(25 cases, 28 eyes), spot break-up group(21 cases, 24 eyes)and random break-up group(20 cases, 25 eyes)according to the different fluorescein tear film break-up patterns(BUPs). The image features of tear film break-up dynamic changes and the image features of TFLL dynamic changes were compared in each group, and the differences in the first non-invasive tear film break-up time(NIBUTf), average non-invasive tear film break-up time(NIBUTav), tear meniscus height(TMH)and fluorescein staining scores were compare,RESULTS:A statistically significant differences were observed in NIBUTf among the groups of patients(P<0.001). Except that there was no difference between spot break-up group and random break-up group(7.56±1.54s vs 8.02±1.86s, P=0.881), other groups had significant differences in pairwise comparisons(P<0.05). There were statistically differences among the groups for NIBUTav(P<0.001). Except that there was no difference between spot break-up group and random break-up group(9.54±2.12s vs 9.73±1.94s, P=0.997), other groups had significant differences in pairwise comparisons(P<0.05). There was statistically difference among the groups for TMH(P<0.001). Except that there was no difference between circle break-up group and line break-up group(0.16±0.03mm vs 0.17±0.03mm, P=0.986), there was no difference between spot break-up group and random break-up group(0.22±0.03mm vs 0.21±0.05mm, P=0.993), other groups had significant differences in pairwise comparisons(P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences among the groups for FL scores and TFLL grading(P<0.001).CONCLUSION:It is shown that different fluorescein BUPs intuitively reflects the tear film structure of the pathological changes according to evaluation and analysis of images feature of dynamic changes of FL tear film and TFLL combined with the results of static examination of tear film. It is helpful for clinicians to identify subtypes of dry eye, which has potential clinical value for the diagnosis and classification of dry eye.