End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure to assess the value of passive leg-raising test in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock / 中华危重病急救医学

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the value of partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P ETCO 2) combined with passive leg raising test (PLR) in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Methods:A total of 43 patients with septic shock admitted to the second department of critical care medicine, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from December 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects. P ETCO 2, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume variation (SVV), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and other hemodynamic indexes were monitored before and after PLR and volume stress test (VE). Subjects were grouped according to the CI variation rate (&Delta;CI) after VE test. Patients with &Delta;CI ≥ 15% were the responding group, and patients with &Delta;CI < 15% were the non-responding group. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to analyze the evaluation value of the change in P ETCO 2 after PLR on the evaluation value of fluid responsiveness. Results:Among the 43 patients, 22 cases were in the responding group, accounting for 51.2%; 21 cases were in the non-responding group, accounting for 48.8%. After the PLR test, the change values of MAP, SVV, CI and P ETCO 2 in the responding group were higher than those in the non-responding group, and the differences were statistically significant [MAP (mmHg) 3.8±2.1 vs. 1.4±2.0, SVV (%) -5.3±2.5 vs. 2.7±2.0, CI (mL·s -1·m -2) 0.48±0.13 vs. 0.14±0.18, P ETCO 2 (mmHg) 3.4±1.8 vs. 1.1±1.0, all P < 0.05, 1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa]. After the VE test, the changes of HR, MAP, SVV, CI and P ETCO 2 in the responding group were higher than those in the non-responding group [HR (times/min) -8.3±2.8 vs. -2.3±3.7, MAP (mmHg) 3.8±2.4 vs. 1.2±1.7, SVV (%) -6.3±3.1 vs. -3.3±2.0, CI (mL·s -1·m -2) 0.51±0.14 vs. 0.16±0.12, P ETCO 2 (mmHg) 3.3±1.2 vs. 1.3±1.1, all P < 0.05]. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the change in P ETCO 2 before and after the PLR test (&Delta;P ETCO 2 PLR) for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 0.881. When the critical value was 5.9%, the sensitivity was 76.7%, the specificity was 89.5%, and the correct index was 0.68; the AUC for SVV baseline assessment of fluid responsiveness was 0.835, and when the cut-off value was 12.8%, the sensitivity was 84.6%, the specificity was 80.0%, and the correct index was 0.65. The predictive value of &Delta;P ETCO 2 was not lower than the SVV baseline. Conclusion:After the PLR test, the change of P ETCO 2 can be used as a non-invasive, simple, safe and reliable indicator for predicting the volume responsiveness of patients with septic shock.