Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy / 中华肝胆外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery ; (12): 889-893, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-932712
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the safety and efficacy of controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy.

Methods:

Patients who underwent hepatectomy from 1 September 2018 to 1 September 2020 at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were studied. There were 133 males and 70 females, with age of (52.9±19.2) years old. They were prospectively randomized into three groups the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group ( n=72), the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group ( n=66) and the selective portal vein occlusion group ( n=65). The clinical data of these three groups before, during and after operation were analysed.

Results:

The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the selective portal vein occlusion group was significantly more than the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group [(226.7±117.9) vs. (115.7±84.2) ml, P<0.05] and the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(226.7±117.9) vs. (128.1±103.6) ml, P<0.05]. The total duration of operation in the selective portal vein occlusion group was significantly longer than the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group [(173.6±51.7) vs. (128.4±36.5) min, P<0.05] and the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(173.6±51.7) vs. (136.1±40.7) min, P<0.05]. The postoperative data showed the AST indexes on day 1 after surgery to be significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group with the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(587.5±189.2) vs. (361.2±158.3) U/L, P<0.05], and the selective portal vein occlusion group [(587.5±189.2) vs. (358.2±162.7) U/L, P<0.05]. The ALT indexes on day 1 after surgery were significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group with the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(609.4±172.5) vs. (414.8±162.2) U/L, P<0.05], and the selective portal vein occlusion group[(609.4±172.5) vs. (395.6±158.7) U/L, P<0.05]. The AST and ALT indexes on day 3 after surgery were significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group, and the selective portal vein occlusion group. Other liver functions, postoperative complications and recovery indexes showed no significantly differences among the three groups.

Conclusions:

All the three methods of hepatic blood flow occlusion were safe and efficacious. The controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion method was simple to use and it provided some protective effect in alleviating hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery Year: 2021 Type: Article