Oral Chinese Patent Medicines for Hyperlipidemia： A Scoping Review of Clinical Evidence / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ABSTRACT

To summarize the status quo of clinical evidence on oral Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of hyperlipidemia through scoping review and thereby provide a reference for clinical application and decision-making in health care. Proprietary Chinese medicines for the treatment of hyperlipidemia （dyslipidemia） were retrieved from relevant catalogs and then screened based on their instructions. Articles on the selected Chinese patent medicines were searched from Chinese and english electronic databases and screened according to the inclusion criteria， followed by data extraction and analysis. The results were described with text and graphs. ①A total of 32 Chinese patent medicines and 1 010 related articles were screened out. ②All the included Chinese patent medicines were made from Chinese medicinal materials， of which 5 were Chinese medicinal extracts，and the remaining 27 were pure Chinese medicinal preparations （the compositions of 1 prescription is confidential）. ③As indicated in the instructions， all the 32 Chinese patent medicines can be used to treat hyperlipidemia with the main syndrome of combined phlegm and blood stasis， and the main effect of them is activating blood and resolving stasis. ④Among the 32 medicines， Xuezhikang tablets （Capsules） and Gypenosides Tablets have the lowest price. ⑤For the 328 key clinical studies， 248 were randomized controlled trials and 80 non-randomized controlled trials. ⑥As for the sample size， randomized controlled trials generally included 28-579 cases， and non-randomized controlled trials 24-152 cases. Clinical studies with more than 200 cases accounted for 9.3% （12/129）. ⑦The most common method was the comparison of the intervention effect of Chinese patent medicine and western medicine （36.5%） and Atorvastatin Calcium Tablets was the preferred western medicine control. The observation duration was generally 56 days （8 weeks）. ⑧In clinical practice， the absolute value of blood lipid decrease and （total） effective rate were often used to evaluate the efficacy， and the effective rate was generally determined based on Clinical Guidelines for New Chinese Medicines. The overall quality of clinical studies on oral Chinese patent medicines is uneven and there is a lack of high-quality clinical evidence. Moreover，there are the risks of unreasonable use and uneasy use of Chinese patent medicine.It is recommended that researchers on proprietary Chinese medicine should further broaden the research ideas，focus on the top-level design of the research plan， and standardize the research process，thereby provide high-quality research evidence for the clinical use of proprietary Chinese medicine. Moreover， more efforts should be made to establish a sound mechanism for information collection and feedback of proprietary Chinese medicine， so as to reduce the risk of uneasy use.We hope that in-depth investigation and discussion should be launched by price， economy， quality evaluation， and other departments headed by the supervision department to make the price of Chinese patent medicine reasonable and fair， thereby promoting the rational use of Chinese patent medicine.