Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin with versus without bevacizumab in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志
Article in Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-953769
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
@#Objective    To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods    The databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM were searched from inception to October 2022 to collect randomized controlled trials of the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of NSCLC. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results    Eight randomized controlled trials were enrolled, involving a total of 1 724 patients. Meta-analysis showed that for the treatment of NSCLC, the disease control rate, overall response rate, 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate were higher in the trial group (paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with bevacizumab) than those in the control group (paclitaxel and carboplatin) (P<0.05); however, the incidences of the adverse reactions, such as leukopenia, hemorrhage, proteinuria and hypertension, etc, were higher in the trial group than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the trial group and the control group in the incidences of fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia or hyponatremia, etc (P>0.05). In addition, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in the trial  group than those in the control group. Conclusion    For the treatment of NSCLC, paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with bevacizumab is superior in terms of disease control, overall response and prolonging patient survival, etc, but will be associated with more adverse reactions.
Key words
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: Zh Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2023 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: Zh Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Year: 2023 Type: Article