Preliminary application of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty using adjusted restricted kinematic alignment / 中华骨科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using adjusted restricted kinematic alignment (arKA).Methods:Data of 14 consecutive cases of OrthoPilot navigation-assisted TKA using arKA from October 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 3 males and 9 females. The average age was 67.71±8.96 years with mean body mass index (BMI) 25.94±3.12 kg/m 2. 27 consecutive patients who underwent navigation-assisted TKA using aMA during the same period were assessed as the control group. There were no significant differences in gender, age or BMI between the two groups. Intraoperative parameters including operative duration, tibia resection angle, frontal femoral angle, axial femoral angle, joint line translation, medial and lateral gap in extension and flexion position were recorded. Radiographic parameters including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral component angle (cFCA), coronal tibial component angle (cTCA), sagittal femoral component angle (sFCA) and sagittal tibial component angle (sTCA) were measured. Functional outcomes were assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score. Surgery-related complications were recorded. Results:All cases were followed up. The mean follow-up of arKA group was 18.57±6.98 months and follow-up of aMA group was 22.15±4.91 months. The intraoperative tibial resection was 3.07°±1.00° in arKA group versus 0.67°±0.56° in aMA group ( P<0.05). The lateral cutting height of tibia was 9.07±1.82 mm in arKA group versus 6.89±2.94 mm in aMA group ( P<0.05). The lateral gap in flexion was 1.71±0.83 mm in arKA group versus 1.04±0.71 mm in aMA group ( P<0.05). The difference of medial-lateral flexion laxity was 1.14±0.86 mm in arKA group versus 0.41±0.75 mm in aMA group ( P<0.05). The postoperative HKA angle was 174.10°±1.63° in arKA group versus 177.12°±2.07° in aMA group ( P<0.05). The cTCA was 87.58°±0.85° in arKA group versus 89.14°±1.23° in aMA group ( P<0.05). The cFCA was 93.10°±1.75° in arKA group versus 90.41°±3.01° in aMA group ( P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in sFCA (1.30°±0.82° vs. 1.56°±1.19°), sTCA (87.16°±0.95° vs. 87.79°±1.04°) and femoral notching (7.1% vs. 11.1%). The preoperative HSS score in arKA group was 46.07±4.68 and HSS score at 1 month postoperatively was 73.86±3.48 ( P<0.05). The preoperative HSS score in aMA group was 47.04±4.52 and HSS score at 1 month postoperatively was 74.04±3.57 ( P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in WOMAC score (12.93±2.37 vs. 12.63±2.34) and HSS score (86.86±2.74 vs. 86.11±2.95) at 6 months postoperatively. 2 cases (14.3%) in arKA group and 5 cases (18.5%) in aMA group had deep venous thrombosis (χ 2=0.12, P=0.733). Conclusion:Navigation-assisted TKA using arKA offers the surgeons a new alignment option for severe knee deformity with satisfactory clinical outcomes, the arKA technique has advantages in soft tissue protection and gap balance regulation compared to aMA technique.